What The Fuss Is All About
These days, buying a wig can be the perfect answer to a number of situations. Given that at this point in time the wigs were for fashion, they were huge, physically, and this type of wig was called the “full bottomed wig.” But in 1720, as it is wont to do, the fashion changed and the popular wigs began to grow smaller, becoming what was called the “bob wig” or “campaign wig” (McLaren 243).
Courts are generally ruled by precedent and tradition, and so, even in the matter of perukes, the stuffy old judges would not let their dignity suffer the reduction of their glorious large wigs and so, in defiance of change, the judges kept to the old fashion of large wigs and so began the custom of wearing a periwig as part of legal formality rather than as a fashion – although younger members did push for smaller versions and ultimately, the junior barristers began wearing shorter “campaign wigs” around 1730 or so (McLaren 243).
Even then, the haughty rich continued to do it anyway, and the flouting of it in the face of famine became such an issue that a tax was imposed on those who wore powdered wigs to the tune http://www.alicewigs.com/extensions/100-remy-hair-extensions/clip-in-remy-hair-extensions.html of a guinea each, which actually netted a hefty sum of £200,000 in just the year 1795.
As recently as the 1990s, attempts were still being Remy Hair Bulk Online Shop 2015 made to be rid of perukes as well, but the populace at large was unwilling to let the tradition go. In a complete reversal of popular opinion from the famine years of the 1790s, the British citizens of modern times like the tradition and feel when asked their opinion on the abolishment idea that the wigs give dignity and gravitas to the judges.
In fact, in perhaps a paradoxical attempt to procure rights to wear the wigs for themselves, some solicitors who’d been allowed to argue cases in the higher courts, started arguing for the right to wear the emblematic wigs as well, still reserved at this time for barristers only.